Author Archive

 

Managing in turbulent times is no longer an exception, it has become the norm. Permanent uncertainty, social pressure and scarcity of resources force us to rethink how we decide, lead and plan. In this Let's talk about... we reflect on management in complex contexts, where we continue to believe that ethics, environmental reading and strategic flexibility are key to sustaining sound strategic decisions.

 

For some years now, we have been noticing that management is no longer exercised in stable or predictable scenarios. What we used to call crisis has become part of the daily life of organizations, projects and institutions. Accelerated changes, social tensions, resource restrictions and growing demands are now part of the usual context in which decisions are made.

In this new scenario, managing is no longer just about planning ahead or applying predefined models. Decision-making implies making decisions with incomplete information, under pressure and assuming that the environment can change at any time. For this reason, we are increasingly reflecting on the need for a management capable of reading the context, interpreting signals and acting judiciously in the midst of complexity.

Managing in turbulent times means accepting that uncertainty is not a transitory stage, but a permanent condition. Decision-making takes place in the midst of rapid changes, limited resources and high social expectations, and where the human impact of each action is increasingly visible. In this framework, leading ceases to be a purely technical exercise and becomes a deeply ethical and situated practice.

One of the main challenges in these contexts is the temptation to paralysis or immediate reaction. Faced with uncertainty, some organizations choose not to decide (wait), hoping that the scenario will become clearer. Others respond impulsively, copying external solutions or applying decontextualized measures. Both responses tend to generate more fragility: the first immobilizes, the second deepens errors and weakens confidence.

 

 

Turbulent periods are also characterized by constant pressure on decision-makers. Expectations are high, margins for error are reduced and the consequences of each action are amplified. This occurs both in public management and in social, academic and business organizations. Decision-making is no longer just a question of efficiency or results, but of responsibility towards people, communities and territories.

In this scenario, management needs to rethink itself from new perspectives. One of them is the reading of context. Understanding the social, political and economic environment, as well as the internal dynamics of the teams and communities with which we work, becomes as important as financial or regulatory analysis. Without a contextual diagnosis, decisions are unlikely to be sustainable over time.

Another fundamental key is strategic flexibility. Managing in turbulent times does not mean improvising, but designing strategies capable of adapting, revising and adjusting continuously. Rigid plans tend to fail when reality changes faster than their implementation. Flexible approaches, on the other hand, allow learning from the process, correcting course and maintaining coherence without losing meaning.

Active listening also plays a central role. In complex contexts, decisions cannot be made from a vertical and isolated logic. Incorporating the voices of teams, social actors and territories not only improves the quality of decisions, but also strengthens their legitimacy and sustainability. Listening does not weaken leadership; it humanizes it and makes it more effective.

Likewise, ethics and consistency take on special weight. When resources are scarce and tensions increase, decisions clearly reveal the values that guide an organization. Managing in crisis implies prioritizing with clear criteria, assuming responsibilities and maintaining coherence between discourse and action, even when the cost is high or the solutions are not immediate.

Finally, it is important to recognize that leading in turbulent times does not mean having all the answers. It implies accepting uncertainty as part of the process, communicating honestly, generating trust and building collective meaning in the face of uncertain scenarios. Management ceases to be an exercise of absolute control and becomes a process of guidance, accompaniment and continuous learning.

In short, managing when uncertainty is the norm requires a more comprehensive, human and contextualized approach. It is not only a matter of resisting the crisis, but also of developing the ability to act with judgment, responsibility and flexibility in the midst of complexity. Because, in turbulent times, making decisions continues to be inevitable, and doing so through conscious management can make the difference between fragility and the possibility of transformation.

Asesórate Management Team

READ MORE →
 

 

Polarization and the loss of spaces for listening are weakening the collective. When dialogue breaks down, coexistence is fragmented and public and organizational decisions are impoverished. In this Let's talk about, we reflect on the urgency of rebuilding spaces of encounter, recognition and mediation, taking human diversity as the basis for strengthening social cohesion in increasingly complex contexts.

 

 

 

In recent years, social dialogue has become increasingly fragile. Positions are hardening, differences are becoming more radical and spaces for listening are shrinking. Polarization not only permeates politics, but also social relations, organizations, communities and decision-making processes. In this context, sustaining the collective becomes one of the greatest challenges of our time.

When dialogue breaks down, the first thing that suffers is trust. Mistrust of others who think differently or of those who come from a different experience or context weakens bonds and fragments coexistence. In polarized societies, disagreement ceases to be an opportunity for construction and becomes perceived as a threat. The result is an impoverishment of public debate and an increasing difficulty in reaching minimum consensus.

This breakdown in dialogue has profound consequences. In the field of public policy, it results in decisions that are disconnected from social realities or in measures imposed without legitimacy. In organizations, it generates tense work climates, blocks collaboration and hinders conflict management. In communities, it erodes the sense of belonging and reinforces dynamics of exclusion and isolation.

One of the most frequent mistakes in the face of polarization is to try to avoid conflict. However, conflict is not the problem in itself. Diverse and complex societies are, by definition, scenarios of different interests, visions and needs. The real problem arises when there is a lack of tools to manage these differences constructively. Where there is no dialogue, conflict becomes chronic or is expressed violently, symbolically or silently.

 

Sustaining the collective in polarized contexts requires, in the first place, recognizing diversity as a constitutive fact of social life. It is not a matter of seeking artificial unanimity, but of generating conditions in which differences can be expressed, heard and dealt with. Dialogue does not eliminate tensions, but it makes it possible to transform them into possible learning and agreements.

In this sense, meeting spaces play a central role. They do not arise spontaneously nor are they maintained by inertia; they require design, care and political and institutional will. Dialogue roundtables, participatory processes, mediation and community dynamics are key tools for rebuilding trust and strengthening the collective. Their value lies not only in the concrete results they generate, but in the very process of listening and mutual recognition.

Another fundamental element is active listening. Listening implies much more than hearing; it implies being willing to understand the other's point of view, even when it is not shared. In polarized societies, listening becomes a profoundly political and ethical act. It allows us to humanize the other, to break stereotypes and to open cracks in closed discourses.

Likewise, sustaining the collective requires leadership capable of facilitating dialogue, not exacerbating confrontation. Leading in these contexts implies moderating, mediating and building bridges, even when this does not always generate immediate consensus or quick results. It is a leadership that is committed to long-term processes and to building trust as the basis for coexistence.

Finally, it is important to say that the collective is not a given state, but a permanent construction. It is strengthened when there are clear rules, channels of participation and an ethic of recognition. It is weakened when imposition, exclusion or silence prevail. In times of polarization, caring for the collective is not a naïve gesture, but an essential strategy for social sustainability.

Recovering the word, listening and encounter is a necessary condition to face contemporary challenges and to build more cohesive and just societies, capable of living together in diversity.

 

Asesórate Management Team

READ MORE →

2025 was a year in which Asesórate Consultores Asociados reaffirmed its reason for being: to produce useful knowledge, generate social impact and strengthen capabilities to transform realities. A year to consolidate learning, to weave new alliances and to assume with conviction the commitment to continue building a fairer and more inclusive society.

Asesórate has earned a place as an entity that thinks, researches, designs, trains and accompanies. Our approach has always been clear: to unite scientific rigor with social commitment. From Spain and with academic and social allies in different countries, we have promoted research-action projects, social innovation and specialized training that respond to the real challenges of our communities.

This year we moved forward with a renewed and strengthened team. Our President and CEO, together with a Board of Directors with complementary expertise -management, research, data, pedagogy, communication- led the institutional consolidation and strategic projection for the coming years. The incorporation of external specialists, according to the needs of each project, allowed us to enrich our work with a diversity of professional perspectives.

Our mission and vision also guided us with clarity: research to transform, train to empower and design social technologies that improve people's lives and enhance their well-being. On this basis, we strengthened six strategic lines of research: post-pandemic emotional well-being, human rights, migration and interculturality, education and digital transformation, social technology and participatory methodologies, and updating in emerging areas of knowledge.

It was also a year of large-scale projects. “Voces en Común”, focused on migration, intercultural dialogue, social cohesion and community intervention in Barcelona, allowed us to further deepen a fundamental issue of our time. On the other hand, “VIVIRED”, focused on the emotional health of the elderly, is moving towards its first version of a mobile application to strengthen bonds and counteract unwanted loneliness. And “Mente en Juego - Conecta y Desconecta”, benefited by the Mapfre Ignacio Larramendi Grant, represents an innovative bet for the emotional and digital wellbeing of early childhood. Finally, we are working on the proposal “Barcelona: blurring borders”, which promotes mutual recognition in diverse and changing contexts. All these projects share a common principle: putting people and their communities at the center.

Training was another of our strengths. We participated in highly specialized programs with academic institutions such as the National Academy of Medicine of Venezuela, UCAM and UCAB, addressing frontier issues: artificial intelligence in research and scientific ethics, human rights of vulnerable groups, migration and new forms of citizenship. We also developed webinars open to the public on scientific arbitration, migration policies, impact-based planning and -very specially- a webinar to break down prejudices and revalue the social role of people from 60 to 80 years old: “Beyond ageism”.

Our line of mentoring continued to grow, accompanying researchers and professionals in different phases of their projects, reinforcing personalized learning and the improvement of research practice.

In the editorial area, we strengthened our intellectual production with the series “Let's talk about...”, a space that brings expert knowledge closer to citizens in a friendly and thoughtful language. The topics addressed -migrations, social memories, childhood, renewable energies, feminism, digital intelligence and more- reflect the diversity of voices and perspectives that make Asesórate a vibrant and plural community.

 

2025 also marked a qualitative leap in institutional communication. We renewed our website, updated visual and informative materials and strengthened our presence in networks, now managed internally with a new vision, aesthetics and strategy. Asesórate's identity grew towards a modern, coherent image, with messages aligned with our values: rigor, ethics, excellence and humanity.

From the administrative management, we comply with the legal and fiscal obligations of our association, and we apply our projects to European and Spanish calls for proposals, paving the way for the next cycles of research and funding.

The achievements of 2025 can be summarized in one key phrase: knowledge that turns into action. Actions that connect, that accompany, that teach, that question and that create opportunities for those who need them most. And, above all, actions that are built collectively.

We look forward to 2026 with enthusiasm and clear objectives: to execute the projects we have developed with such care, expand our network of partnerships, position ourselves even more in the field of social innovation and inclusive technologies, and expand our training and mentoring offerings to reach further and more people.

We close this year with deep gratitude. To our team for their constant dedication, to the institutions and organizations that trust us, and to all the people who inspire us every day to continue. Your support makes it possible for our ideas to come to life and for our work to make sense.

 

This year we did it together.

Next time, we will continue to transform together.

Josefa Orfila - Adelaida Struck - Rita Amelii - Mony Vidal - Francisco J Fernandez

READ MORE →

Christmas is a season that arouses emotion, it means different things to each one of us, and that is precisely where its richness lies. Recognizing the plurality of meanings that each person gives it from their own history. In our traditions are linked memories that accompany us all our lives: the smells of the kitchen, the melodies that each year sound in the background, the embrace of those who are no longer with us but who return in the form of shared stories and anecdotes. Remembering is also celebrating, thanking and recognizing that the bonds we have woven are still alive in our emotional memory. In times of accelerated changes and social and economic challenges, Christmas goes beyond a repeated ritual, it invites us to look inward and ask ourselves what sustains us, what values move us, what relationships strengthen us and what dreams we want to make come true.

For some people it is family, celebration, reunions and laughter around a table. For others, it is nostalgia, memory and silence. For many, it is a time of faith and gratitude and for many others, a period in which loneliness and absences weigh a little more than usual.

Christmas is not only a personal time, it is also a social space. Getting together does not necessarily mean big parties; it can be the simple gesture of a call to someone who is far away, a pending conversation, a shared cup of coffee. These are gestures that say: “I am here”. In a society that currently pushes us towards individualism, this time reminds us that we do not walk alone, that we are a community, a network of support and mutual care. This time invites us to look beyond our affective boundaries, to recognize the neighbor, the migrant, the grandparent who lives in loneliness, the one who is going through an illness or an economic hardship. No celebration is complete if we forget the empathy that is the bridge that allows us to see the humanity of the other.

This is also the time to imagine new beginnings. Calendars are renewed and with them the possibility of dreaming differently. Hope is not naivety; it is the ability to see the light even in complex moments. It is the belief that there is a kinder, fairer and more humane tomorrow. Every smile we give, every act of solidarity, every word that reconciles is a seed and Christmas offers us the fertile time to sow it. Hope has many forms: it can be the desire for greater family peace, the illusion of a personal project that is opening up, the conviction that wounds also heal and that relationships can be reunited.

For those who live Christmas in faith, this time brings with it the message of love that is present and life that is renewed. But even beyond religious beliefs, there is a lay spirituality that this time awakens: the search for meaning, the need for hope, the desire for peace in our lives and in our societies.

Christmas is also about asking ourselves how we can be a mirror of goodness for those around us and how we can bring light within our possibilities, from a simple gesture to a decision that transforms. It is a reminder that making the commitment to build a better future begins with small steps that are within our reach.

Today, when distances feel shorter thanks to technology, but emotional disconnections seem to be deeper, perhaps it is more necessary than ever to ask ourselves what is essential to us, what deserves our time and attention.

May this December not be measured only in purchases or commitments, but in authentic encounters. May we give less things and more company, less haste and more listening, less perfection and more genuine affection. Christmas can be an opportunity to slow down, to reconnect with what is important and to understand that happiness is nourished by real bonds and gestures that come from the heart.

Finally, we can say that for us, Christmas is a profound act of humanity and gratitude. Acknowledging others, opening spaces of affection, reaching out and sharing life. It is there, in these small daily actions, where Christmas reveals its transforming power. Let us remember that hope is still alive, that love is still our greatest driving force, that every life deserves dignity and that solidarity makes us a community. In a world that is sometimes filled with uncertainty, Christmas reminds us that there is always an opportunity to unite, to heal and to build together a more just, more empathetic and brighter future.

Josefa Orfila - Adelaida Struck - Rita Amelii - Mony Vidal - Francisco J Fernandez

READ MORE →

This act of homage to the one who deserves it, to the one who is still with us, to the one who really forged a generation of physical anthropologists guided by a deep knowledge of the subject, scientific rigor and standards of duty, behavior and punctuality, consistent with a research professional, was undoubtedly worthwhile.

Why? Because it allowed us to celebrate with a sincere motive, admiration and respect, because it united in a single day, students, colleagues from different parts of the world, her family, always with a common memory, Prof. Betty.

Because it contributed to every member of Asesórate, adding a good idea, so that the event was a success, so that no one or nothing was missing, so that our Honoree felt at home. One more example that teamwork is what works. Thank you!

Because, in addition, it is evident that time passes, but people and their deeds remain. This is very important. It allows to discern with clarity and certainty that you did not make a mistake in your path, that you found great people in it and that walking together, forming teams, is what enhances the value of science.

For my part, I feel happy, satisfied. I can say, a tribute that was conceived from the sincere affection, admiration and gratitude to a great teacher.

I think the best way to write this Let's talk about the event, is by several hands. I now pass the pen to Josefa, who has been the architect in the consolidation of this event and who, having listened to the words of our honoree, expresses: “...The summary we have heard is a beautiful memory of her life. And precisely, I would like to take advantage of this space to share a brief academic reflection on the subject: The usefulness of memories in research. Memory is not just a nostalgic recollection. In science, memory, understood as the sum of trajectory, experience and documented legacy, is an essential tool. The legacy of Dr. Méndez that we celebrate today is irrefutable proof of this. In research, especially in Physical or Biological Anthropology, memory operates at two crucial levels and Dr. Méndez has been a constant reference for her academic demand, ethics, discipline and order in research. This is methodological memory in action. She has taught us that the way research is conducted is as vital as the result. The memory of her rigor is what prevents us from making past mistakes and what ensures the quality of the data today. It is his example of how to get a measurement right, how to interpret data, and how to maintain scientific integrity. His commitment to order made it clear to us that rigorous methodology must be an institutional memory that is passed on from generation to generation, ensuring that knowledge is cumulative and reliable.

The second level is the documentary memory, which is embodied in his valuable scientific production. His recent article: “Academic journey: from curiosity to specialty.” published in the journal Anales de Nutrición (2025, https://doi.org/10.54624/2025.38.1.005 ) exhibits what is a memory in itself. He not only presents data, but contextualizes his journey, offering the map of an intellectual journey of great magnitude, in which each of us has played our part. His work becomes, once again, a bibliographic reference of the first order. His constancy and dedication reflect that memory is not static, it is a dynamic memory that is continually updated.

Professor Betty's Anthropology is not a museum discipline, it is an applied science that has strengthened fields such as health, nutrition and sports. This is where the usefulness of this memoir becomes tangible.

Today, as we celebrate her academic and human legacy, we are celebrating the usefulness of memory personified. Profe Betty has left us more than articles; she has left us a didactic memory in the classroom, an ethical memory in research and an affective memory in every sustained encounter. She taught us that the best way to honor the scientific past is not only to remember it, but to use it to move forward. She is the integral colleague and the constant referent of a journey of excellence, curiosity and commitment...”

 

Dear Profe Betty - Dr. Betty Méndez de Pérez: the mark you have left on us is not just a memory. It is the living memory that drives us. Thank you, we have learned a lot. Thank you for your immense legacy!

Josefa Orfila - Adelaida Struck - Rita Amelii - Mony Vidal - Francisco J Fernandez

READ MORE →

Artificial intelligence (AI) has become one of the most profound technological transformations of our time. Its ability to process data, generate answers and support decision-making in multiple fields, such as medicine, education, business management or scientific research, opens up possibilities never seen before.
However, the question we must ask ourselves as a society is clear: how to ensure that this powerful tool is developed and used with social awareness?

Technological progress has never been neutral. Each innovation reflects the priorities, values and structures of the society that produces it. In the case of AI, the risk of reproducing inequalities, reinforcing stereotypes or amplifying exclusions remains present, unless criteria of responsibility and social justice are incorporated into its design and application.
Instead of just asking ourselves what artificial intelligence can do, it becomes imperative to think about what it should do and for whom? The visible benefits in the field of health, such as earlier diagnoses, analysis of medical images and management of personalized treatments, are a fact. In education, it allows the design of resources adapted to the needs of each student, promoting the inclusion of those who require differentiated support. In knowledge management, it speeds up research processes, facilitates the organization of large volumes of information and opens doors to collaborative networking. These achievements are undeniable and constitute a positive potential for improving the quality of life of millions of people. However, behind the benefits also lie ethical and social dilemmas that we cannot ignore.
Among the latent risks is the generation of bias. If algorithms are trained with incomplete data or loaded with historical bias, the results may perpetuate discrimination based on gender, ethnicity, age or socioeconomic status.
Another challenge is the digital divide. While some countries and social sectors have access to the most advanced technological resources, others are left behind, widening the gap between those who participate in innovation and those who only receive it passively. This inequality directly affects vulnerable groups and raises the need for public policies that promote equitable access to technology.
Privacy is another central issue. The massive use of personal data to power AI systems requires clear regulatory frameworks that protect fundamental rights. In democratic societies, transparency and informed consent must be at the heart of any technological development.

In the face of all these risks, the concept of «socially conscious AI» becomes relevant. It is not a matter of attributing conscience to the machine, but of ensuring that its design, implementation and use are guided by ethical values and principles of justice. This implies:
1. Inclusive designs: integrate diversity in the teams that create algorithms, to avoid partial views that reproduce bias.
Transparency: ensuring that citizens understand how and why the AI makes certain decisions.
3. Shared responsibility: governments, companies, educational institutions and civil society must work together in the construction of regulatory frameworks and best practices.
4. Critical digital education: preparing new generations to interact with AI not only as users, but also as citizens capable of questioning, understanding and deciding on its social impact.

The irruption of artificial intelligence brings with it a historic opportunity to rethink the future, confronting us with the choice of allowing technological development to become an end in itself or transforming it into a means to build fairer, more inclusive and sustainable societies.
We must direct AI advances toward collective goals that strengthen human dignity, equity and solidarity.

As researchers and consultants, we believe that the key is to promote an interdisciplinary approach that combines scientific rigor with social sensitivity. AI should not only be a technical issue, but a field of dialogue between sciences, humanities and citizenship. By doing so, we will be able to direct its use towards improving everyday life, preventing it from becoming an instrument of control or exclusion.

In conclusion, we can affirm that artificial intelligence is, by itself, neither good nor bad. It is a reflection of human decisions and of the values that guide us in its construction. Betting on artificial intelligence with a social conscience means recognizing that technological progress must be at the service of collective welfare and not the other way around. The future is in our hands: we can allow AI to amplify inequalities or we can use it to weave a more inclusive and just society. The choice, as always, rests with us.

 

Asesórate Consultores Asociados Academic Team

READ MORE →

SOCIO-AFFECTIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE FIRST FIVE YEARS OF LIFE, THE INVISIBLE FOUNDATIONS OF THE HUMAN BEING
Accompanying emotional development in the first years of life is fundamental for the formation of the human being. Every look, hug and word leaves deep traces in the mind and heart. It is not just about caring, but about connecting. Developmental neuroscience has shown that children's brains are shaped by the quality of the bond with their attachment figures. Feeling protected and listened to activates circuits of calm and trust, while indifference generates stress and alertness.
From developmental psychology, we know that the first five years are the stage where children build their self and develop the foundations of their identity, self-esteem and ability to relate to others. From the first year, they experience security by feeling protected and cared for; this basic trust will be the seed of their future emotional well-being. Between the ages of two and three, autonomy and curiosity emerge; around the ages of four and five, empathy, cooperation and the first signs of moral awareness appear.
During this stage key emotional skills are strengthened such as: Self-regulation: calming down and waiting; Empathy: recognizing other people's emotions; and Self-esteem: feeling capable, valuable and loved.
The role of caregivers is irreplaceable: it is not about being perfect, but about being present, listening, containing and accompanying. Simple gestures such as looking into the eyes, responding calmly and maintaining safe routines convey the message: «you are important, you are safe, you can trust».
These capacities, sustained by a stable affective relationship, constitute the foundation of personality and psychological well-being. International agencies such as the World Health Organization (WHO) and UNICEF emphasize that early childhood from 0 to 5 years of age is a critical window for emotional, social and cognitive development, and recommend safe, nurturing and stimulating environments where children can explore freely, feel loved and understood.
When I see families in consultation, I often observe how adolescents and adults who grew up in stable environments show greater resilience, empathy and ability to relate; and those who express insecure attachments show difficulties in trusting and managing emotions.
Today, these learnings are especially relevant in a changing, technological society, where human interactions are often replaced by screens and immediacy has replaced waiting. While technology can be a valuable learning tool, its overuse can limit emotional communication, attention and patience. In contemporary homes, it is essential to create spaces for real connection, where dialogue, shared play and mutual gazing remain the primary language of love. Children need adults who really look at them, not just watch them from a screen.
In a fluid world where certainties change rapidly, firm emotional roots are the compass that helps children and future adults remain stable, empathetic and resilient.

 

Msc. María Elisa Pizzutti

READ MORE →

In modern pediatric practice, it is becoming increasingly evident that the quality of care depends not only on diagnosis or treatment, but also on how the child is involved in decisions that affect his or her body and well-being. Listening to them, informing them and allowing them to participate is not a gesture of courtesy, but a clinical, ethical and emotional necessity that strengthens trust, improves therapeutic adherence and reduces anxiety. Understanding the child as an active subject of his or her own health process is a decisive step towards truly humanized care.
The Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted by the United Nations in 1989, enshrines the child's right to be heard and to have his or her views taken into account in accordance with his or her age and maturity. This principle, known as the right to participation, is not limited to school or social life: it also extends to the health field. Allowing a child or adolescent to intervene in decisions about his or her health means recognizing him or her as a person with a progressive capacity to understand, give opinions and make decisions. This does not imply transferring adult responsibility, but accompanying their process of understanding and autonomy with empathy and accessible language.
Studies in pediatric psychology show that when children are actively involved in choosing tests or treatments, they experience less anxiety and a greater sense of control. That sense of control contributes to their emotional and physical well-being, and has a direct impact on treatment adherence. In other words, the child who understands what is happening to him and feels that his opinion matters cooperates better, recovers more serenely and develops a positive attitude toward medical care.
In the clinical setting, three concepts are used that must be understood in a complementary manner: parental permission, child assent and mature adolescent consent. Parental permission is the legal authorization given by the representatives. Assent, on the other hand, is the affirmative agreement of the child, depending on his or her degree of understanding. It is not a signature on a piece of paper, but a process of dialogue in which the physician explains, answers questions and validates the child's understanding. Finally, consent is applied when the adolescent demonstrates sufficient maturity to understand the implications of his or her decision and can assume it responsibly. This scheme seeks to balance respect for family authority with the progressive autonomy of the minor.
The role of the pediatrician and the healthcare team is essential for this participation to be real. It involves talking to the child in a language he/she can understand, using visual aids or everyday examples, and allowing him/her to express doubts or fears. It is not enough to explain: it is necessary to verify understanding, give space for questions and offer alternatives whenever possible. Participation should be gradual and adapted to age: in preschoolers it can focus on simple choices («do you want me to listen to your chest or your back first?»); in schoolchildren, on concrete decisions and more detailed explanations; and in adolescents, on conversations where they can become involved in an informed and responsible way.
When the child feels that his or her voice counts, the dynamics of the therapeutic relationship change. They are no longer «obedient patients», but active participants in their own care process. This approach strengthens the alliance between doctor, patient and family, favors communication and reduces conflicts arising from fear or misunderstanding. In addition, it prepares children for self-management of their health in adult life, an essential learning in times when medical information is available to all, but critical understanding remains a challenge.
Respecting children's right to participate in decisions about their health is a concrete way to promote their overall well-being. It involves recognizing that they are capable of thinking, questioning and deciding within the limits of their maturity. Every consultation conversation can be transformed into an educational, emotional and ethical opportunity to teach them how to take care of themselves. Listening to them is not only a professional duty: it is a way to build confidence, alleviate fears and prepare citizens who are more aware and responsible for their own bodies.
Today's pediatrics is not only measured in technological advances, but also in the ability of professionals and families to listen and accompany with respect. Allowing children to participate in the decisions that concern them is to lay the foundations for a more solid emotional health and a more empathetic society. Caring for them also means giving them a voice. This is the medicine that heals and teaches: the one that turns each consultation into a space of trust, dialogue and shared growth.

 

J. Planchet

READ MORE →

For centuries, conflicts have been interpreted, confronted and resolved - or aggravated - from the traditional zero-sum view in which someone has to win by force or imposition. Women, historically removed from the formal spaces of negotiation and decision-making, have instead exercised an often invisible mediation: that which takes place in communities, in homes, in family ties.  

Women, especially those who come from community struggles, experiences of exclusion or from ancestral traditions that assign them the maintenance of social equilibrium, bring a different vision: based on listening, empathy, mutual recognition and the search for solutions that heal, that repair and not only impose agreements. 

It is becoming increasingly evident that conflicts, far from being simple confrontations, are complex expressions of inequalities, emotions, unheard stories and unmet needs. Resolving them requires tools, yes, but also a gaze capable of seeing in the fracture an opportunity for care, for repair and for transformation.

Therefore, when women have access to training in conflict resolution, they not only acquire useful techniques for their communities, but also broaden the horizon from which to understand power, justice and peace. And that is where the feminist perspective makes a difference.

A woman who learns to mediate does not limit herself to 'calming tempers' or 'conciliating' from a neutrality that often perpetuates inequalities. A woman mediator, aware that crises affect women and girls differently, understands that not all conflicts are symmetrical, that silenced voices need to be heard and that there is no peace without justice.

Tools for conflict transformation - such as active listening, identification of deep needs, facilitation of dialogue and collective construction of solutions - are essential to break cycles of violence. But these tools are not applied in a vacuum: they make sense in the context of ethical relationships, trust and mutual recognition. 

Many women who today are trained in these methodologies do so not from abstract theory, but from their daily experience of oppression, exclusion or violence. These experiences, far from being obstacles, become sources of legitimacy, empathy and connection with other women. By learning to listen deeply, by being able to name and express what hurts them and by being able to build agreements with others, something changes in them and they become referents for transforming the power dynamics in their communities.

In contexts marked by polarization, crisis and social fragmentation, the training of women as mediators, facilitators of dialogue and promoters of restorative solutions represents a powerful political strategy. Without idealizing them or burdening them with a new responsibility, it is a matter of giving them the opportunity that their knowledge, their experiences and their capacity for care also have a place in decision-making processes.

When women intervene in conflict resolution with a feminist perspective, what they contribute is not only the concrete agreement they reach, but also the way in which this process takes place: did they all feel heard, was there space to show their vulnerability, were emotions taken care of, was the damage repaired, was there transformation or only agreed silence? Sometimes these women who learn the tools of mediation agree to silence on some difficult issues in the hope of being able to air them in the future, but while they are weaving networks of trust, they listen to each other, they take care of each other.

From this perspective, training in conflict resolution does not offer a magic formula, but rather an ethical framework, useful tools and, above all, a space where women can recognize themselves as political subjects capable of transforming realities. Women who not only survive conflicts, but who re-signify them, go through them together with others, and in this gesture, open new paths for justice and peace.

The future of our communities will depend, to a large extent, on our ability to dialogue without fear, to repair what has been damaged without vengeance, and to support each other when there seems to be no way out. In that future, women must be present.

 

Natalia Brandler

@nataliabrandler

READ MORE →

At the crossroads of the 21st century, we can say that humanity faces challenges that demand bold and transformative responses. The climate crisis, social inequality and energy precariousness call for an ethical look at the development model. In this context, the energy transition is not only an environmental imperative, but also represents an unprecedented opportunity to rethink global welfare from a social justice perspective.

At the heart of this transformation are alternative energies, catalysts for a future where sustainability and equity must go hand in hand. Historically, the most vulnerable communities have borne the burden of pollution generated by traditional energy production systems. At the same time, millions of people still lack basic access to energy, so social justice must be placed at the center of the debate, considering it as a universal right and not a privilege. 

Alternative sources - solar, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and sustainable biomass - offer us concrete possibilities to break with these patterns of exclusion. Their ability to generate energy in a decentralized way brings it closer to those who need it most, reducing territorial inequalities and strengthening the autonomy of communities. This is not just electrification: it is a real improvement in their quality of life.

This energy transition also has a direct impact on public health. It replaces polluting sources with clean technologies, reducing emissions of toxic gases and harmful particles that affect respiratory and cardiovascular health. Breathing cleaner air is not only an environmental issue, it is an investment in health and dignity.

I deeply believe that this transformation can also be the basis for a new, fairer and more inclusive economy. The new alternative energy sector is generating thousands of green jobs: installers, technicians, engineers, manufacturers. For this wave of employment to be truly equitable, we must ensure that it includes people who today depend on fossil fuels, through training and retraining. A just transition leaves no one behind and contributes to reducing social gaps. Resilience is also strengthened by investing in clean energy. By generating energy locally, we reduce dependence on global chains and exposure to geopolitical or economic crises. Furthermore, investment in renewable infrastructure can revitalize forgotten territories, generate local value chains and foster community-based innovation.

We can conclude that the energy transition is much more than a technical transformation, it is an ethical decision. Betting on alternative energies in the service of social justice is one of the ways to build a more equitable, resilient and sustainable world. It means putting people, their rights and their territories at the center.

Dubraska Rodriguez

August 2025

READ MORE →